DISTINCTIVE FEATURES OF THE REVIEW OF JUDICIAL ACTS AS AN IMPORTANT GUARANTEE OF ENSURING THE RIGHTS OF PERSONS PARTICIPATING IN A CASE IN ADMINISTRATIVE COURT PROCEEDINGS
Abstract
This paper analyses the legal nature of the institution of the review of judicial acts in ensuring the rights and legitimate interests of persons participating in a case, together with its place and significance as a system comprising the appellate, cassation and supervisory (revision) stages. On the basis of the norms of national legislation, the paper examines the operating mechanism of this institution and reveals its role within the system of procedural guarantees. Particular attention is devoted to the questions of ensuring the lawfulness and well-foundedness of judicial practice through the review of lower-court decisions, and the distinctive features of the mechanisms for reviewing judicial acts in the administrative court systems of foreign States are examined on the basis of a comparative-legal analysis. The respects in which these mechanisms are similar to, and differ from, national legislation are also revealed.
References
1. Council of Europe, European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ), Report on European Judicial Systems, 2022/2024 editions.
2. C.H. Beck, Verwaltungsgerichtsordnung (VwGO), §§ 42, 124–127; Kopp/Schenke, Verwaltungsgerichtsordnung Kommentar, Munich 2020.
3. R.G. de Lange, Administrative Law of the European Union; European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) case-law on access to court and effective remedy (Article 6 and Article 13 ECHR).
4. Bernhard Schlink, Prozessrecht und Verfassungsrecht, Munich 2022.
5. Ossenbühl, Fritz; Cornils, Matthias. Staatshaftungsrecht und Verwaltungsrechtsprechung. 6th ed. Cologne: Carl Heymanns Verlag, 2018.
6. Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Administrative Court Proceedings.
7. Resolution of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. PQ-188 of 19 May 2025 // National Database of Legislative Data, 20 May 2025, No. 07/25/188/0455.
