AI-ENABLED ESG RISK MONITORING FOR RESILIENT REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CHAINS

Authors

  • Azimova Maxfuza Rashidovna Lecturer at the Department of Green Economy and Agribusiness, Bukhara State University, Bukhara, Uzbekistan Author
  • Anvarova Sevinch Akmalovna Student at Bukhara State University, Bukhara, Uzbekistan Author

Abstract

This article develops a methodological framework for applying artificial intelligence to Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) risk monitoring in regional industrial supply chains. The study argues that ESG management becomes more effective when environmental, social and governance data are transformed into early-warning signals rather than used only for retrospective reporting. Using the IMRAD structure, the research combines comparative analysis, process mapping, indicator grouping, a five-point risk assessment and conceptual modelling. A Regional ESG Resilience Index is proposed to evaluate energy and climate exposure, supplier responsibility, workforce safety, data reliability and governance transparency. The results show that AI-supported monitoring can identify abnormal resource consumption, emerging supplier risks, unsafe operational patterns and reporting gaps before they develop into major disruptions. However, the effectiveness of the system depends on data quality, human oversight, cybersecurity and clearly assigned managerial responsibility. The proposed framework includes three tables and three analytical diagrams and may be adapted by industrial enterprises, regional authorities and investors seeking to improve sustainability, resilience and investment attractiveness.

References

1. Global Reporting Initiative. (2021). GRI 1: Foundation 2021.

2. Global Reporting Initiative. (2021). GRI 2: General Disclosures 2021.

3. Global Reporting Initiative. (2021). GRI 3: Material Topics 2021.

4. IFRS Foundation. (2023). IFRS S1: General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information.

5. IFRS Foundation. (2023). IFRS S2: Climate-related Disclosures.

6. OECD. (2023). OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct.

7. OECD. (2018). OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct.

8. OECD. (2023). G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2023.

9. United Nations Industrial Development Organization. (2025). NDC 3.0 Guidebook for Industrial Decarbonization.

10. International Organization for Standardization. (2015). ISO 14001:2015 Environmental management systems — Requirements with guidance for use.

11. International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines.

12. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.

13. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857.

14. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2,000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233.

15. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-17