CRITERIA FOR COGNITIVE-SEMANTIC LEARNING OF GREEN ENERGY TERMS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES
Keywords:
Green energy, green energy terminology, cognitive semantics, concept, term, semantic field, conceptosphere, frame, metaphor, metonymy, comparative analysis, English language, Uzbek language, renewable energy.Abstract
This article examines the main criteria for the cognitive-semantic study of green energy terms in English and Uzbek. It analyzes the semantic structure, conceptual features, and national-cultural aspects of terms in this field, together with the mechanisms of their formation in the two languages. The semantic field, conceptual categories, and processes of metaphorical and metonymic meaning formation are identified as the key criteria of analysis, along with the cognitive modeling and frame-based classification of terms. The results help reveal the regularities of environmental and energy terminology formation in English and Uzbek and contribute to improving modern terminological systems.
References
1. Baker, M. In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation. — London; New York: Routledge, 1992. — 304 p.
2. Bassnett, S. Translation Studies. 3rd ed. — London; New York: Routledge, 2002. — 176 p.
3. Bowker, L., Pearson, J. Working with Specialized Language: A Practical Guide to Using Corpora. — London; New York: Routledge, 2002. — 242 p.
4. Cabré, M.T. Terminology: Theory, Methods and Applications. — Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1999. — 248 p.
5. Cabré, M.T. The Communicative Theory of Terminology, a Linguistic Approach to Terms // Revue française de linguistique appliquée. — 2009. — Vol. XIV, No. 2. — P. 9–15.
